🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, campaigners, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing number of nations are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' youth". The policy could be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an similar ban remains "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to approve a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic motion demanding a ban for minors unless parental consent is granted. Although it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," said the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Previously, support built behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration committed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. An organization set up by the relatives of a teenager who died after being exposed to disturbing platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to create tools that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, action is mostly happening at the regional level amid country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced bills requiring parental consent for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from some figures to mimic the Australian example, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from the West, further states are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations take a more measured tone. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The body notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve safety.

While this global discussion continues, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that states around the world are less and less content to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.